My other gallery at Deviantart is:
http://wagnerf.deviantart.com/
....................................................
My other adult gallery is: http://www.jabarchives.com/tjalite/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/10578
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Vicky and Frankie.
As Deviantart removed this pic, I´m posting it in here. So, people will be able to see and have a copy of it.
I don't even think its a policy thing I think people are just keeping you from posting your art by claiming its violating poilcy, try reposting the image and see if it gets taken down again.
I seriously down they have a clearly defined and working policy. I have see way too much random acts of censorship at times, then at other times a blatant lack of it where it would very likely be appropriate.
They at the DA take down your art (and some other artists I know of), and yet these leave stuff like this up: http://reiq.deviantart.com/gallery/
Ya Ive been To rieq Gallery. He actualy states he works for hentai companies. (even though I like his works) But the fact of it getting close to porn isnt the issue. 95% of his characters are made up. When wagner does a fan art he is subject to child porn laws. For example. The reason they took down this pic was probably (im guessing) Cause Vicky isnt 18 years of age. I think shes 16.
But like I siad, Thats why we should all be glad he has this blogger ^^
Not new but great anyway. The underage thing is to much stupid! How can you say if Vicky isn´t 18 in that pick??? She dosen´t has her ID. I have the same problem with a Kim Possible/Raven pick...
This is bullcrap. Something like the Billy and Mandy pics at this blog...I can definitely understand those getting pulled, but this?! This is nothing more than two women (clothed, might I add?) with their impressive busts pressed against each other. Meanwhile, a picture of a real woman's snatch can stay at the site until the end of time. Where's the justice, here?!
I think people are missing the Fact that it has nothing to do with nudity, Its an Age Factor. And Really In my Opinion we Should stop Complaining. Its DA's Website, and they will run it how they want to. It cant be helped. Lets be glad wagner Is nice to come up with a solution and post on BLogger.
The point is that these are not real people and they have no real age. Maybe they are both 34 in the picture... you can´t prove they are less than 18 in that shot.
Guys, the issue is that the owners to the copyrights of those characters would ALMOST CERTAINLY not want the distribution of these images to occur. Whether they have actually been in contact with them or not is pretty irrelevant too, I think Devart has a perfectly good reason to not allow these images. BECAUSE IT WOULD GET THEM IN TROUBLE WITH BIGASS COMPANIES. They've skirted the line before with anime images, and it made people unhappy, but it was what they felt needed to be done to help the community survive. As creative and original as the pics are, they must feel that they have to draw the line at a point - and the larger Devart gets, the more likely they will be targeted for lawsuit action.
Anyway, I just jumped on here to critique the shadow on Frankie's eye make her look like she's been punched. Damn cool pic though.
I think it had to do more with copyright laws. I know this other artist that did Scooby Doo and The Jetson and he had to take it off his site because Warner Brothers was going to sue him. This is his site http://www.jabcomix.com/main.shtml some of you might have seen some of his artwork online.
15 comments:
They're going to make dA so safe for kids that only kids will want to use it.
post a preview in Da only by a the heads and in the description scripta link redirect of this image , this is my recomendation
only a examples:
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/36116660/
I don't even think its a policy thing I think people are just keeping you from posting your art by claiming its violating poilcy, try reposting the image and see if it gets taken down again.
I wouldnt let it bother you. Thats why you made BLogger in the first place right =)
I dont know why they would take this one down though. It wasnt really that bad.
I seriously down they have a clearly defined and working policy. I have see way too much random acts of censorship at times, then at other times a blatant lack of it where it would very likely be appropriate.
They at the DA take down your art (and some other artists I know of), and yet these leave stuff like this up:
http://reiq.deviantart.com/gallery/
Still, thanks for the post.
Ya Ive been To rieq Gallery. He actualy states he works for hentai companies. (even though I like his works) But the fact of it getting close to porn isnt the issue. 95% of his characters are made up. When wagner does a fan art he is subject to child porn laws. For example. The reason they took down this pic was probably (im guessing) Cause Vicky isnt 18 years of age. I think shes 16.
But like I siad, Thats why we should all be glad he has this blogger ^^
Not new but great anyway.
The underage thing is to much stupid! How can you say if Vicky isn´t 18 in that pick??? She dosen´t has her ID.
I have the same problem with a Kim Possible/Raven pick...
This is bullcrap. Something like the Billy and Mandy pics at this blog...I can definitely understand those getting pulled, but this?! This is nothing more than two women (clothed, might I add?) with their impressive busts pressed against each other. Meanwhile, a picture of a real woman's snatch can stay at the site until the end of time. Where's the justice, here?!
I think people are missing the Fact that it has nothing to do with nudity, Its an Age Factor. And Really In my Opinion we Should stop Complaining. Its DA's Website, and they will run it how they want to. It cant be helped. Lets be glad wagner Is nice to come up with a solution and post on BLogger.
:)
The point is that these are not real people and they have no real age. Maybe they are both 34 in the picture... you can´t prove they are less than 18 in that shot.
Guys, the issue is that the owners to the copyrights of those characters would ALMOST CERTAINLY not want the distribution of these images to occur. Whether they have actually been in contact with them or not is pretty irrelevant too, I think Devart has a perfectly good reason to not allow these images. BECAUSE IT WOULD GET THEM IN TROUBLE WITH BIGASS COMPANIES. They've skirted the line before with anime images, and it made people unhappy, but it was what they felt needed to be done to help the community survive. As creative and original as the pics are, they must feel that they have to draw the line at a point - and the larger Devart gets, the more likely they will be targeted for lawsuit action.
Anyway, I just jumped on here to critique the shadow on Frankie's eye make her look like she's been punched. Damn cool pic though.
cant you submit pics if a adult only blocker on DA?
I think it had to do more with copyright laws. I know this other artist that did Scooby Doo and The Jetson and he had to take it off his site because Warner Brothers was going to sue him. This is his site http://www.jabcomix.com/main.shtml some of you might have seen some of his artwork online.
SEEEEEEEXXYYYYYYYYY sex sex sex sex SEEEEEEXXX!
Post a Comment